But there are cases, where both values exist, therefore this discussion should not forget about this special case, that's why I added it to the examples above ( Help_talk:Citation_Style_1/Archive_62#Problem_with_journals,_magazines_(and_books)_using_all_three_parameters:_volume,_issue_and_number). In most cases, only one out of issue and number would be given at the same time in this case, the current practise is to treat them the same and not add a prefix like #. Example: Volume 15, Number 179, Issue 11, Pages 14–23.
|periodical-mode=full → Volume v, Number n, Issue i, Page p.|periodical-mode=scientific → v (in): p.The most common styles would be similar to: The way page numbers are displayed would be controllable by this setting, but it would be combined with the style for volumes, issues and numbers, because not all combinations make sense. Izno ( talk) 15:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Do templates even work in TemplateData? They didn't before, nor did wiki markup, that's why the usual cs1|2 template documentation could officially be merged into one. I also do not believe the change will work, since substing doesn't work inside tags. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Yes, the change would cause those kinds of errors. 01:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Will this TemplateData change result in access-date without URL errors?Ĭoffeeandcrumbs: Will this change to cite news/doc result in "access-date without URL" errors when editors use VE to insert a cite news template for an off-line source? I don't use VE, so I don't have a way to test it. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Module:Citation/CS1/autofix has been nominated for deletion. 64.18.9.207 ( talk) 12:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Module:Citation/CS1/autofix I remember this blocked user from this page, as someone somewhat obsessed with performance. In this case, the premise (auto-fixing) is useful though the execution is lacking.
Content should be judged on its own merit, even if the motivation of the author is suspect. 01:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC) This is a flawed approach. Trappist the monk ( talk) 00:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC) There's no point in userfying content by indefinitely blocked users. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC) It could move to Module:Sandbox/Wikid77/Citation/CS1/autofix where is can be invoked. We could move it to the user's space, but I don't know if modules can be invoked from User space. Izno ( talk) 22:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC) I have documented it. It appears to have been that user's sandbox. 21:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC) No, it is unused by CS1. If it is used, could someone add documentation? * Pppery * it has begun. It appears to be a failed test by a since-banned user. Is Module:Citation/CS1/autofix used by anything?
#BIRDFONT KERNING STRINGS ARCHIVE#
19 Deprecated archive switch parameter on cite magazine.18 Apostrophes are stripped from titles.15 Proposed documentation and parameter alias changes for Template:Cite_episode.12 support for various deprecated parameters withdrawn.10 ISBN wikilinks on Template:Cite book (edit request).9 Smart substitution token to reduce redundancy among input parameters.8 Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources § "Work" versus "agency" versus "publisher".7 support for |editors= withdrawn (in the sandbox).2 Will this TemplateData change result in access-date without URL errors?.
0 kommentar(er)
